Abstract
This article aims to determine how public prosecution deals with criminal reports concerning Article 297 of the Slovenian Penal Code on hate speech and explores the influence of the 2019 Slovenian Supreme Court judgment on this practice. The analysis is based on 98 closed case files of the prosecution from 2019 to 2023. The main findings indicate that the number of indictments and convictions remains low; criminal prosecution of cases is inconsistent; there are regional differences in prosecutorial practice; the impact of the 2019 decision is low; and the quality of documents produced by the prosecutor’s offices is deficient.
References
Advocate of the Principle of Equality (2023–2024): Advocate of the Principle of Equality [Zagovornik načela enakosti], Redno letno poročilo za leto 2023, 2024. https://zagovornik.si/izdelki-zagovornika/letno-porocilo/ (last access: 2024-07-22).
Askola, Heli (2015): Taking the Bait? Lessons from a Hate Speech Prosecution. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 30, 1, 51–71.
Banks, James (2010): Regulating Hate Speech Online. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 24, 3, 233–239.
Bleich, Erik (2011): The Rise of Hate Speech and Hate Crime Laws in Liberal Democracies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 6, 917–934.
Cohen, Roni (2014): Regulating Hate Speech: Nothing Customary About It. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15, 1, 229–255.
Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia [Ustava Republike Slovenije], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 33/91-I, as amended.
Council of Europe (2016): Challenges for Judicial Independence and Impartiality in the Member States of the Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/sginf-2016-3rev-challenges-judicial-independence-/16807778b9 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Court judgment No. I – County Court Črnomelj, Court judgment No. I K 18267/2020.
Court judgment No. II – County Court Kranj, Court judgment No. II K 16255/2020.
Criminal Proceedings Act. Criminal Proceedings Act [Zakon o kazenskem postopku], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 176/21, as amended.
Čeferin, Rok, Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža & Damjan Korošec, Damjan (2019): Javno spodbujanje sovraštva, nasilja ali nestrpnosti: 297. člen. V: Korošec, Damjan, Filipčič, Katja & Helena Devetak (ur.): Veliki znanstveni komentar posebnega dela Kazenskega zakonika (KZ-1). 1. natis. Ljubljana, Uradni list Republike Slovenije – Pravna fakulteta, 417–438.
ECHR (1976): European Court of Human Rights Handyside v. United Kingdom, Application No. 5493/72, 1976.
ECHR (1995): European Court of Human Rights Walendy v. Germany, Application No. 21128/93, 1995.
ECRI (2019): European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance, Council of Europe: ECRI Report on Slovenia. Fifth Monitoring Cycle. https://rm.coe.int/government-comments-on-the-fifth-report-on-slovenia/168094cb03 (last access: 2024-07-22).
European Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA. European Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of November 28, 2008 on Combating Certain Forms and Expressions of Racism and Xenophobia by Means of Criminal Law, OJ L 328, 6. 12. 2008, 55–58.
Galič, Aleš (2003): Argument precedensa ali stališče Ustavnega sodišča RS o prepovedi samovoljnega odstopa od sodne prakse. Revus, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.1431.
Garman, John J. (2008): The European Union Combats Racism and Xenophobia by Forbidding Expression. University of Toledo Law Review, 39, 843.
George, Cherian (2014): Hate Speech Law and Policy. In: Ang, Peng Hwa & Robin Mansell (eds.): The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs139 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Gutmann, Jerg & Stefan Voigt (2019): The Independence of Prosecutors and Government Accountability. Supreme Court Economic Review, 27, 1–19.
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 660, p. 195, 21 December 1965. https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/unga/1965/en/13974 (last access: 2024-10-22).
Jacobs, Laura & Joost van Spanje (2006): Prosecuted, Yet Popular? Hate Speech Prosecution of Anti-Immigration Politicians in the News and Electoral Support. Comparative European Politics, 18, 899–924.
Kellow, Christine L. & H. Leslie Steeves (2006): The Role of Radio in the Rwandan Genocide. Journal of Communication, 48, 3, 107–128.
Kerševan, Erik (2012): Precedenčna moč odločitev Ustavnega sodišča. Pravnik, 76, 11/12, 797–835, 947–948.
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža (2015): Sovražni govor kot uradno pregonljivo kaznivo dejanje. V: Zbornik 2015. 1. dnevi prava zasebnosti in svobode izražanja, Kranjska Gora, 9. in 10. april 2015. Ljubljana, IUS Software – GV založba, 23–27.
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža (2018): Sovražni govor: vloga prava in pravosodja. V: Teršek, Andraž (ur.): Svoboda izražanja, mediji in demokracija v postfaktični družbi: filozofske, teoretične in praktične refleksije. Ljubljana, Lexpera – GV založba, 91–102.
Law Amending the Penal Code. Law Amending the Penal Code [Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Kazenskega zakonika], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 91/2011.
Mafeza, Faustin (2016): Preventing Genocide by Fighting Against Hate Speech. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4, 3, 117–132.
Messanga, Gustave Adolphe (2021): The Role of Radio-Télévision Libre Des Mille Collines in the Rwandan Genocide: An Analysis From The Theoretical Perspectives of Intergroup Threat and Aggression. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5, 9, 154–163.
Mitev, Jasmina (2019): Sovražni govor kot kaznivo dejanje: diplomsko delo. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=74393 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Pech, Laurent (2009): The Law of Holocaust Denial in Europe: Towards a (Qualified) EU-Wide Criminal Prohibition, SSRN Electronic Journal, Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/09. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536078 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Penal Code (2008): Penal Code [Kazenski zakonik, KZ-1], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 55/08.
Penal Code. Penal Code – Official Consolidated Text [Kazenski zakonik – uradno prečiščeno besedilo, KZ-1], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 50/12, as amended.
Peršak, Nina (2022): Criminalising Hate Crime and Hate Speech at EU Level: Extending the List of Eurocrimes Under Article 83(1) TFEU. Crim Law Forum, 33, 2, 85–119.
Posselt, Gerald (2017): Can Hatred Speak? On the Linguistic Dimensions of Hate Crime. Linguistik Online, 82, 3, 5–25.
Rosenfeld, Michael (2003): Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis. Cardozo Law Review, 24, 1523–1567.
Schabas, William A. (2007): Hate Speech in Rwanda: The Road to Genocide. In: Lattimer, Mark (ed.): Genocide and Human Rights. London, Routledge, 231–261.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia (2019): Judgment No. VSRS I Ips 65803/2012, July 4, 2019. https://www.sodnapraksa.si/?q=*:*&database[SOVS]=SOVS&database[IESP]=IESP&database[VDSS]=VDSS&database[UPRS]=UPRS&_submit=i%C5%A1%C4%8Di&id=2015081111431656 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office (2013): Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office [Vrhovno državno tožilstvo], Pregon kaznivega dejanja Javnega spodbujanja sovraštva, nasilja ali nestrpnosti po 297. členu KZ-1 – pravno stališče, 27. 2. 2013. http://safe.si/spletno-oko/pravna-podlaga-0 (last access: 2024-07-22).
Štajnpihler, Tilen (2010): Smisel precedenčnega učinka sodnih odločb. Zbornik znanstvenih razprav, 70, 255–284.
Varuh človekovih pravic (2021): Human Rights Ombudsman [Varuh človekovih pravic], Kazenskopravni pregon sovražnega govora v Sloveniji po 297. členu kazenskega zakonika (KZ-1): Analiza tožilske prakse pregona kaznivega dejanja javnega spodbujanja sovraštva, nasilja in nestrpnosti v obdobju 2008-2018, Ljubljana, maj 2021. https://www.varuh-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Razne_publikacije/Sovrazni_govor_knjizica2.pdf (last access: last access: 2024-07-22).
Voigt, Stefan & Alexander J. Wulf (2019): What Makes Prosecutors Independent? Analysing the Institutional Determinants of Prosecutorial Independence. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15, 1, 99–120.
Završnik, Aleš (2017): Zakaj obsodb sovražnega govora v Sloveniji ni? Od okov implementacije do rigidnosti razlage. Ljubljana, SAZU, 101–114.
Završnik, Aleš & Vanja Zrimšek (2017): Sovražni govor po slovenski kaznovalni zakonodaji in sodni praksi: neustaven položaj. Časopis za kritiko znanosti, 45, 268, 59–73.
Zufall, Frederike, Hamacher, Marius, Kloppenborg, Katharina &Torsten Zesch (2022): A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU’s Legal Framework Against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Task. In: Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2022. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Association for Computational Linguistics, 53–64.
Žgur, Matija (2025): Prvostopenjsko uradniško odločanje v izrednih razmerah. O dilemi med vladavino prava in učinkovitostjo ter vlogi infraprava. Pravnik, 142, 1–2, 11–34.
List of case files of the State Prosecutor’s Office
Kt 18208/2021/MI-tp
Kt 21366/2020/5/KP-sš
Kt 702/2021/NVI
Kt/10154/2021/MA
Kt/10302/2020/NVI
Kt/10913/2021/NVI
Kt/10966/2020/NVI
Kt/12680/2023/BH/KG
Kt/137/2023/ME
Kt/14299/2018
Kt/14374/2023/ME/nn
Kt/16687/2020/NM/vc
Kt/16788/2021/NČ/ar
Kt/17440/2020/UL
Kt/17605/2020/ME/tj
Kt/17734/2020/IŠ
Kt/17958/2022/ME/sž
Kt/18069/2020/ME/kh
Kt/18208/2021/MI-tp
Kt/18277/2020/AJ
Kt/18841/2016/EE
Kt/1925/2020/ME/kh
Kt/21186/2019/BB
Kt/21877/2019/NČ/dč
Kt/21366/2020/KP
Kt/23361/2020/AJ
Kt/23429/2019/IŠ
Kt/24009/2016/AB
Kt/24599/2019/LM
Kt/25452/2017/AJ
Kt/3382/2020/MA
Kt/3713/2021/MK/AZ
Kt/3723/2020/IŠ
Kt/4036/2019/NČ
Kt/4231/2018/KP
Kt/5168/2020/ME/sm
Kt/5189/2023/ME/nn
Kt/702/2021/NVI
Kt/7726/2021/LM/LM/ss
Kt/8082/2018/PVZ/LK
Kt/9197/2016/AN
Kt/14299/2018/NVI
Kt/14374/2023/ME
Kt/3603/2022/LM
Kt/5189/2023/ME

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Neža Kogovšek Šalamon , Sergeja Hrvatič

